To Robert Naiman, of JustForeignPolicy:

Good to know what kind of person you really are — a disgusting, underhanded, partisan Democrat who will stoop to low levels to support the most aggressive pro-war candidate the Democrats have produced. How can you call yourself a peace activist?

What are your ties to the Clinton campaign? Are they paying you to do this dirty work for them? Are you an insider given this information as part of the Clinton campaign’s effort to slander Jill Stein with falsehoods? Thank you for exposing the campaign against Stein by the Clinton team — we will spread this widely because it is not only an opportunity to expose you but to expose the Clinton campaign. Maybe a press release along the lines of: Phony Peace Activist Exposes Clinton Campaign Smearing of Jill Stein. You have created an opportunity for us to get the truth out.

You have exposed yourself as a corrupt Democratic Party partisan who will play dirty politics to help elect a war hawk and silence the only real peace candidate. The people of Syria will thank you when she murders thousands after escalating that war, so will the people of Iran, also on her hit list. And, if she gets the US into war with Russia, with her support of the NATO escalation on their border and her extreme rhetoric against Putin and Russia, they will thank you as well. Then, there is China, where Clinton is the source of the Asian Pivot that is taking over the Asian Pacific to dominate China; they will also appreciate your support for Hillary when she creates chaos and war in that region. On top of war there are her regime change operations in Honduras, Venezuela, Ukraine and other nations. They will appreciate your support for Clinton as well.

Do you even realize what you are doing? Are you so blinded by partisanship that you do not realize the wars you are helping to start? Or, is your organization one that really wants a militarist in office in order to justify its funding for Just Foreign Policy?

Really disgusting, Robert. You have obviously lost my respect and will lose respect throughout the movement because this will be shared to tens of thousands. Everyone will know that you have no credibility and cannot be trusted.

What are you going to do to make up for this now that you have been caught? Are you going to deny it or fess up to it and apologize to everyone whom you sent this to? What will you say to Jill Stein, a very ethical and well educated medical doctor who really believes in peace (unlike you)?

Jill Stein and her campaign are well aware of what you have done. We have made sure to tell them. Many of them are bcc’d on this email, along with writers and people in the media who will be interested in reporting this story along with the attached email below which includes your full email and has been sent to many lists. Your credibility is crud as people now know who you really are.

Anyone who is BCC’d on this email, you are welcome to share it, publish it or in any other way get the information out about Robert Naiman and the Clinton Campaign’s smear slander of Jill Stein.

NOTE: Robert Naiman is playing really grotesque politics. The supposed peace activist is not only supporting the pro-war militarist Hillary Clinton, but he is playing dirty politics encouraging people to send false attacks out against Jill Stein around the Internet. He seems to know the coordinated attacks by Democrats against Stein are false, (saying “No warranty, express or implied. You don’t have to prove that Jill Stein is anti-science conspiracy theorist) but he wants to spread them any way in order to undermine her. I knew Naiman was a Democrat but did not know how disgusting and underhanded a Democrat he was.

Here is what Naiman is sending to people via email:

> From: Robert Naiman <naiman.uiuc@gmail.com >
> If you have a lot of Facebook friends, you may have recently noticed a high level of activity on your Facebook feed by Jill Stein acolytes.
> If so, you may find the following links useful to throw them off their game. No warranty, express or implied. You don’t have to prove that Jill Stein is an anti-science conspiracy theorist. You just have to say, “There are unanswered questions about whether Jill Stein is an anti-science conspiracy theorist.”
> There’s Nothing Green About Jill Stein’s Vaccine Stance
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2016/07/29/theres-nothing-green-about-jill-steins-vaccine-stance/#35b3a40b6465
> Jill Stein on vaccines: People have “real questions”
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/29/jill-stein-on-vaccines-people-have-real-questions/
> Jill Stein Promotes Homeopathy, Panders On Vaccines http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2016/07/jill-stein-promotes-homeopathy-panders-on-vaccines/
> Jill Stein Worries Wi-Fi Is Dangerous For Kids
> http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2016/08/jill-stein-worries-wi-fi-is-dangerous-for-kids/
> ===
> Robert Naiman
> Policy Director
> Just Foreign Policy
> www.justforeignpolicy.org
> naiman@justforeignpolicy.org

The reality is Jill Stein, MD is a Harvard trained doctor who has a long history of writing about environmental dangers to health. She is very pro-science, indeed the Greens are the most pro-science party in the United States because it is not corrupted by corporate money that undermines science and regulation. Here is the truth to Naiman’s slanderous statements:

• Stein supports vaccines’s as foundation to a public health system to prevents epidemics, but she knows there have also been cases of Big Pharma corrupting the regulatory process to push through vaccines and other drugs which turn out to be dangerous.
• Jill Stein does not promote homeopathy, in fact the Greens do not either. This was a minor plank in a 200+ page platform that went unnoticed but has been removed from the Greens platform, Stein has never supported unproven scientific remedies (which is what homeopathy is).
• As to wifi, there are issues and around the world governments are banning wifis in schools and not allowing kids to use them. This is an area where once again US corporate interests have prevented research that is needed. She is not anti-wifi but is calling for more research in this area.

The US needs to use a precautionary principle for new substances and devices that are put on the market, as most of the developed world does. The US, caving into industry, allows drugs on the market if they are similar to already approved drugs, this is why we have GMO’s while other countries ban them.

Robert — please can you stop spreading false rumors. It is a disgusting practice and should raise questions about people trusting anything you write. Your ties to the Democratic Party are too tight and have obviously shown that partisan politics comes before preventing war.

Kevin Zeese is an American political activist who has been a leader in the drug policy reform and peace movements and in efforts to ensure a voter verified paper audit trail. He was on the ballot as the nominee of the Maryland Green Party for a U.S. Senate seat during the 2006 election. Zeese also co-directs PopularResistance.org which grew out of his work with Occupy.